Structured Settlement Payments Are Inflexible
To  achieve "qualified" status and receive tax benefits, the  settlement  must include provisions that make the structured settlement  payments  inflexible. Once settled, the agreed-upon payment amounts and  schedule  of payments cannot be changed. In some circumstances,  structured  settlement recipients may find the inflexibility of their  settlements  too constraining.
The settlement payee or a close dependent  might fall ill and  might need a substantial sum of cash might to pay  for expensive  medication. An investment opportunity might appear that  promises  definite returns. In such cases, the inflexible nature of  structured  settlement payments could prove a serious problem. Other  uses for a  lump sum payment might include:
- Education costs
- Home Repairs
- Vehicle purchase or repairs
- Health and medical needs
- Home purchase
Structured Settlement Factoring Services Appear
In  response to the widely-felt problem of inflexible  structured settlement  payments, new kinds of factoring services  appeared in the market.  Traditionally, factoring companies bought  future payments due to a  business, such as accounts receivable, and  paid immediate cash. Some  firms began to offer factoring services to  annuitants, buying out their  structured settlement payment rights and  paying them immediate cash.
Initially,  insurance companies were hostile to this new  development. They were not  being notified of the assignment of their  payments, and feared that  factoring might affect the favorable tax  treatment of annuities.
Legislation  regularized the assignment of the right to  structured settlement  payments. Provided the transaction is made in a  transparent manner and  was in the best interests of the annuitant, the  law imposes no tax  penalties on the sale of structured settlements.
To qualify  for tax advantages, the sale of structured  settlement transaction  requires (i) disclosure of the details of the  transaction to the  seller, (ii) giving notice to specific interested  parties, and (iii)  court approval to the transfer. Some states have  also made it mandatory  for the annuitant to discuss the transaction  with his or her attorney.  State mandated time frames set limits for the  various stages of the  sales transaction. Before approving the  transaction, a court determines  whether the transaction is in the best  interests of the annuitant.
 
